Category: Race Equality

89990151_asian2

‘Different’ Scots approach to race equality identified

, , , , 0

Scotland is developing a different approach to race equality to the rest of the UK, a new report has said.

Matters of equality are reserved to the UK government at Westminster.

But the report said successive Scottish governments had developed distinctive Scottish policies.

It said considerable progress has been made in tackling racism but a significant proportion of the black and ethnic minority (BME) community had experienced discrimination.

The report, Scotland and Race Equality: Directions in Policy and Identity, was produced by the Runnymede Trust, an independent think tank on race equality and race relations.

Professor Nasar Meer of Strathclyde University, who edited it, said the Scottish government controlled health and education, so was responsible for ensuring equality polices were applied in these areas.

He said: “Because health and education are devolved, the Scottish government also takes on equality duties there. These include equal opportunities monitoring, such as the number of BME workers in the NHS and the rest of the public sector.”

‘Ethnic penalties’

But he said there was still much to do, with ‘ethnic penalties’ continuing to permeate life-chances in education and employment. .

“If we look at the data, we find consistently that young men from BME backgrounds are more likely to be unemployed or in lower-paid work in Scotland than in other parts of the UK,” he said.

“And while pupils from black or ethnic minorities show better educational outcomes than white children, they are considerably under-represented in the workplace, in management or supervisory positions.”

The researchers called for the delivery of racial equality initiatives to be assessed in the context of the new Race Equality Framework Scotland.

Announcing the 15-year programme, in March 2016, the Scottish government said it was determined to show leadership in advancing race equality, tackling racism and addressing the barriers that prevented people from minority ethnic communities from realising their potential.

It set out how this would be progressed from 2016 to 2030.

Carol Young, of the Coalition of Race Equality and Rights (CRER), said: “Scotland’s public sector needs to get to grips with some concepts it may find uncomfortable.

“Stronger, bolder commitments from our public authorities are needed to ensure Scotland’s approach to race equality is successful to challenge racial inequality effectively.”

Omar Khan, director of the Runnymede Trust, said: “Race equality hasn’t featured centrally in the reinvigorated debates about Scotland’s identity and its place in the UK.

“Runnymede is delighted to publish this important volume outlining the distinctive debates and policies on race equality in Scotland, but also their relevance for the rest of the United Kingdom.”

BBC

equality act

The new Equality Act and you

, , , , , , , , , , , 0

It has been hailed as a landmark move to harmonise discrimination legislation and to strengthen the law to support progress on equality.

But what will the Equality Act mean in practice for employers and employees?

The Act will have a big impact on employers and they should ensure that their equal opportunity and recruitment policies are compliant.

The new law is likely to have a greater impact on smaller organisations as they are less likely to have comprehensive anti-discrimination and harassment policies already in place.

While this will mean extra work, once in force it should ensure that both employers and employees benefit from a fairer and more transparent workplace.

Wide ranging

The Act requires organisations of all sizes and types to promote equality and avoid discrimination in the workplace.

It also aims to tackle the pay gap between men and women.

The new law consolidates and clarifies the existing discrimination legislation concerning sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion or belief and age, and seeks to adopt a single approach where appropriate.

It also contains a number of important changes to the law.

Here are the key measures:

Direct discrimination

The definition of direct discrimination has been simplified to less favourable treatment because of a protected characteristic, for example sex, race, and disability.

It has also been made clear that discrimination based on association and perception is unlawful across all strands of discrimination.

For example, if someone is treated less favourably because one of their relatives is homosexual, this will amount to direct discrimination. Equally, if they are treated less favourably because of a perceived characteristic, this will be covered.

Indirect discrimination

Protections from indirect discrimination is extended to all protected characteristics, such as age, marriage and civil partnership, sex, sexual orientation, race, religion or belief, disability and gender reassignment.

Harassment definition extended

Harassment will have the same definition across all strands of discrimination.

The focus will be on preventing “unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment”.

A one-off incident may amount to harassment, and so the victim need not have made the perpetrator aware that the conduct was unwanted.

The definition covers conduct which is “related to” a protected characteristic – a protected characteristic being sex, race, religious belief etc.

This means that there is no need for the particular employee’s characteristics to be the reason for the unwanted conduct in order to trigger liability.

Association and perception harassment is now covered.

Protection from harassment has been further extended so that the employer can be held liable for harassment by a third party, such as a customer or contractor.

This will only apply if harassment has occurred on at least two earlier occasions and the employer has failed to take reasonably practicable steps to stop it.

Pay secrecy

Many contracts of employment contain clauses which prevent employees from discussing their pay or bonuses.

It was initially proposed to ban secrecy clauses altogether. In seeking to justify the proposed ban, the then Equalities Minister, Harriet Harman, said that official figures show that whilst the gender pay gap has been narrowing over recent years, it still remains that for every pound a man earns, a woman earns just 87 pence.

Female part-time workers earn as much as 40% less than their full-time male counterparts.

The new law will make these types of clauses unenforceable (but not ban them altogether), and protect an individual from victimisation if action is taken against them for discussing their pay with their colleagues.

It is hoped that increased transparency in pay will narrow the gap further.

Health questionnaires

Except in limited circumstances, the Act prevents employers from asking prospective employees about their health before offering them work (or before including them in a pool of applicants from whom they intend to select a person to whom to offer work).

Information and positive discrimination

The Act will require private sector employers with at least 250 employees to publish information about differences in pay between male and female employees. However, this will not come into force until April 2013 at the earliest.

Where an employer reasonably believes that people with a protected characteristic are disadvantaged, have different needs or are disproportionately under-represented, they may take proportionate measures to enable or encourage persons with the relevant characteristic to overcome that disadvantage, to meet their needs, or to enable or encourage their increased participation.

It was also intended to introduce positive action in recruitment and promotion. However, these measures have proved controversial and have not yet been brought into force.

Wider powers for Employment Tribunals

At present, if an employment tribunal upholds a claim of discrimination, harassment or equal pay, it is only able to make awards of financial compensation.

Under the new Act, tribunals will be able to make recommendations that benefit the whole workforce, rather than just applying a remedy to the individual that brought the claim.

For example it could recommend that an organisation introduces or revises its equal opportunities policy, or provides training for its managers.

The power to make recommendations does not extend to equal pay claims.

Public sector equality

Public sector employers are already expected to have in place policies dealing with their duties in relation to race, gender and disability.

These policies require “due regard” to be given to the need to promote equality, and contain specific obligations to carry out ethnic monitoring and produce written equality schemes and equality impact assessments.

The Act will replace these current duties with a unified duty that will cover all discrimination strands, but these provisions will not come into force on 1 October 2010.

Private sector employers should not assume that this will not affect them.

Any organisation that contracts with public sector bodies may see a knock-on effect, with the public sector body taking the private organisation’s equality policy into account when deciding to whom they will award the contract.

Timetable

The long-awaited Act follows more than four years of reviews, discussions and consultations.

The new law will have effect in England, Wales and Scotland.

The majority of the Act will come into force come into force on 1 October 2010, as intended. However, some provisions (combined discrimination and public sector equality duties) will come into force later.

The opinions expressed are those of the author and are not held by the BBC or EqualityUK unless specifically stated. The material is for general information only and does not constitute investment, tax, legal or other form of advice. You should not rely on this information to make (or refrain from making) any decisions.